Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04296
Original file (BC 2013 04296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:		 DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04296	
	   		         COUNSEL:  NONE
	 		         HEARING DESIRED:  NO
     

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The decedent’s DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States 
Report of Transfer or Discharge; be amended to reflect he was 
honorably discharged.   
  
_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Upon her husband’s death, it was discovered that he is listed as 
only serving in the Reserves.  He served on active duty from   
19 Jun 56 to 18 Jun 60; then in the Reserves from 18 Jun 60 to 
18 Jun 62 for a total of 6 years.

In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from 
the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), copies of the 
decedent’s DD Form 214, DD Form 256AF, Honorable Discharge 
Certificate; Reserve Orders dated 31 May 62, and death 
certificate.  
  
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 19 Jun 56, the decedent entered active duty.

On 18 Jun 60, he was released from active duty.

He served 4 years on active duty.

Upon his release from active duty, he was transferred to the 
Individual Reserve Section to complete the remainder of his 
Military Service Obligation (MSO).  

On 18 Jun 62, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve. 

________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial.  The decedent’s DD Form 256AF and 
discharge order are correct.  He was not on active duty when he 
was discharged.  His DD Form 214 shows he was released from 
active duty and incurred his Reserve obligation until 18 Jun 62.  
The decedent’s family can be assured that his 6 years of total 
military service is recognized, just not all of it on active 
duty.

The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit B.  

____________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 24 Jan 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was provided to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  
As of this date, this office has not received a response.   

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.      

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission; however, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the 
basis for our conclusion.  As reflected on his DD Form 214, he 
completed four years of active duty service and was released on 
18 Jun 60 to complete the remainder of his MSO in the Reserves.  
On 18 Jun 62, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force 
Reserve as annotated on his DD Form 256AF.  The decedent’s 
complete service is recognized and correctly documented.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.  

________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04296 in Executive Session on 26 Jun 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
     
       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member


The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Sep 13, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 14 Jan 14. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.     
     



								 
      Panel Chair
 


  
 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04415

    Original file (BC-2010-04415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record shows the decedent elected not to participate at this time. The applicant stated the decedent was not married at the time of eligibility; however, the record shows Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center sent a spousal notification letter to the member’s spouse because the member did not make an election. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00315

    Original file (bc-2013-00315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, does not reflect his AFOR and his AFAM. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of the applicant’s requests that his record be corrected to reflect two overseas tours of active duty covering the periods of 20 Sep 1988 to 12 Feb 1990 and 15 Oct 1990 to 14 Mar 1991 and that he be entitled to the AFOR. Moreover, on 20 Mar 2013, the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03957

    Original file (BC 2013 03957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, regulation requires the issuance of a DD Form 214 based on reserve personnel ordered to active duty for a contingency operation and for reserve personnel being separated from the Air Force after having served 90 days or more of active duty for training. However, NPRC previously provided a statement of service to the Navy in 1965 showing Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve service with periods of active duty for training but no active duty. While the applicant contends his DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01102

    Original file (BC 2014 01102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, for the period of service 30 Sep 57 to 20 Aug 60, be corrected to add the following awards: 1. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the NDSM, indicating there is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01578

    Original file (BC 2014 01578.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records should be corrected to reflect the award of the NDSM for his service of 8 Aug 56 through 7 Aug 62. In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 256, Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 7 Aug 62 and DD Form 214, and DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05129

    Original file (BC 2013 05129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his rank as technical sergeant (E-6), instead of staff sergeant (E-5). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there was no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant was a staff sergeant (E-5)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04652

    Original file (BC-2010-04652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04652 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He would like service credit for his time served in the Air Force Reserve (AFR) from 18 Jul 56 to 6 Sep 61. After he retired, he tried to reconstruct his records knowing that his honorable discharge from the AFR was a part of his Army...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148

    Original file (BC 2013 05148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05007

    Original file (BC 2013 05007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflective of his continuous honorable reserve service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02727

    Original file (BC-2010-02727.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect that she made timely notification of his death so she may receive benefits under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant states she was misinformed by the member’s ANG unit to wait until his 60th birthday (16 Jun 10) to file a claim for benefits. Exhibit B. Decedent’s Master Personnel Records.